Breakfast at Monsanto’s Sheds Light on Health Dangers of World’s Most Used Weedkiller: Exclusive Interview

Posted on Aug 30 2021 - 2:51pm by Sustainable Pulse

Sustainable Pulse interview with Lee A. Evslin, M.D., author of the new eye-opening book Breakfast at Monsanto’s and board-certified pediatrician and Fellow in the American Academy of Pediatrics.

What led to your interest in Monsanto and specifically glyphosate herbicides – is this interest related to your work as a pediatrician? 

In 2012, the Island of Kaua`i became embroiled in one of the most divisive controversies in its history. Four chemical seed companies and a coffee company were reported to be spraying eighteen tons of restricted use pesticides per year in fields close to several small towns. They were even spraying large amounts less than 100 feet from the open widows of a middle school. The Island’s County Council tried to pass legislation requiring buffer zones and the right to know what was being sprayed, and where. The chemical-seed companies mounted an aggressive defense of their right to not be regulated by the county. They bused in hundreds of blue shirted employees to the hearings. The concerned citizens often wore red shirts, and the tensions were high.

Also in 2012, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) published a policy statement. The opening lines included the concept that there is growing concern about the adverse health consequences of chronic low-level pesticide exposure in children. Low-level meaning the type of exposure you might get from living near agricultural fields, or from pesticides in your food, or from playing in fields, homes, or playgrounds that have been recently sprayed.

In 2014, I was invited to join a Hawai`i state-sponsored fact-finding task force. We were asked to examine the possible health and environmental consequences of the intensive pesticide spraying on Kaua`i. The committee met extensively over a period of 14 months. I became deeply concerned by the disconnect between what the chemical companies were saying about the safety of their products and the dangers that were so clearly demonstrated in the medical and scientific literature. Two pesticides particularly drew my attention. They were the toxic insecticide, chlorpyrifos, and the herbicide, Roundup. After the task force concluded its review and published recommendations, I continued my research and legislative activism. Hawai`i became the first state in the union to ban chlorpyrifos and my Roundup research turned into this short book.

Are other pediatricians aware of the serious issues surrounding glyphosate and other harmful pesticides?

The pediatricians on the island joined me in our testimony to the County Council and the Hawaii Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics submitted testimony to the State Legislature concerning chlorpyrifos. The 2012 AAP policy statement outlining the dangers of low-level cumulative exposure of pesticides was an eye-opener for most pediatricians. We were taught about poisoning from drinking a pesticide or being inadvertently sprayed. Most of us had not given much thought to the possible dangers of chronic low-level exposure. I think there is a growing understanding by pediatricians about the dangers of environmental toxins and probably not nearly enough concern about our daily exposure to Roundup-like chemicals in our diet, yards, and parks.

Your book offers a powerful review of the scientific evidence linking glyphosate to adverse effects on humans and other life forms – however how did you make sure to not cherry pick your sources and did you have a particular view on the subject before you studied the evidence and wrote the book?

I first became concerned about glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) such as Roundup when I learned that glyphosate had been patented as an antibiotic. My earliest research centered on this chemical’s ability to alter the balance of bacteria in and on our bodies. I then reviewed Dr. Nancy Swanson’s study. Her team graphed the large number of medical conditions that increased in prevalence in lock step with the increasing use of these herbicides.

A correlation in time never proves that one event causes another but if there are mechanisms that might demonstrate a connection, those mechanisms should be explored. The more I looked at the scientific research on GBHs, the more I realized that most of the more recently published research shows these chemical formulations to be toxic. I also discovered that the majority of studies reported to show safety were done decades ago, were often done with less sophisticated testing modalities, and because they were paid for by Monsanto and other corporate bodies, many of the studies are not even available for review by the public.

When I was reviewing the academic literature, I made sure to explore evidence across the spectrum. I wanted to understand what published scientific research said about the safety of these increasingly common chemicals.

Do you believe your book will lead to change – how do you see your work affecting the conversation surrounding glyphosate and other toxic chemicals?

I have heard great comments from readers, many who have stated that my book is enjoyable and easy to read despite its scientific orientation. The book is short, to the point, and compelling. It clearly calls for greater scrutiny and regulation. Roundup-like chemicals are the most heavily sprayed herbicides in history. Studies from around the world show that the populations of many countries have some glyphosate in their bodies most of the time. It is time for all of us to be concerned and I hope my book helps raise the level of awareness.

Do you have any other books in the pipeline as we would love to find out more about this and other subjects that have caught your attention?

In the last eighteen months, I have been mostly involved in COVID related research activities. I was hoping that we would soon move on from the devastating effect of this pandemic, but unfortunately COVID is not done with us.

I do believe though, that these Roundup-like herbicides may have made COVID worse in America. The book outlines the real possibility that these chemicals play a role in our twin epidemics of obesity and chronic diseases. People with chronic diseases and obesity are among those who become the sickest and die the most often from this virus.

What do you believe others in the medical world can do to change the public’s level of knowledge on exposure to glyphosate?

I would love to see the day come that a routine part of a medical history includes documenting exposures to possible toxins including pesticides. This is beginning to happen but is not yet sufficiently widespread. I would also like to see the increased ease of testing and reporting on the quantities of pesticides (including glyphosate) in our food and in biologic samples such as urine, hair, and blood.

The more we can measure, the better we can regulate and set policies. The evidence of toxicity is much too strong to continue to treat chronic pesticide exposure as a safe aspect of modern life.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
(6 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
About the Author

Sustainable Pulse is a global news outlet covering sustainable agriculture, GMOs and pesticides.

5 Comments so far. Feel free to join this conversation.

  1. Theodora Carroll September 3, 2021 at 20:25 - Reply

    Where can I buy this book? thank you.

  2. Don September 3, 2021 at 23:08 - Reply

    Let’s start with eliminating the use of glyphosate as a desiccant. It’s routinely used on pre-harvest non-GMO crops to kill plants before harvest (ie, to dry them before harvest).

    To the best of my knowledge, ALL other pesticides have a pre-harvest interval – a period before harvest when use is not allowed. The idea is to limit the amount of residual pesticide that is allowed into the food chain.

    The fact that glyphosate is the only pesticide that is exempt, it inexcusable. The response of regulatory agencies has been to simply increase the allowable amount of residue in our food.

    Glyphosate’s use as a herbicide is, today, coming to an end because of the emergence of weed resistance (I mean who could ever have predicted that?) But it can still be sprayed all over non-GMO crops (eg, wheat) just before it’s harvested and turned into breakfast cereal, biscuits, bread.

    We live in a weird world.

  3. Peg September 7, 2021 at 21:14 - Reply

    Dr. Evslin,
    I thought your well-written article was worthy but if you’ve spent 18 months involved in covid research, but haven’t noticed that there’s no proof such a virus exists, and the agenda-driven PCR “test” is a documented sham (shame also), how can your article be taken seriously?
    Also, Don’s comment – if Roundup is being used on GMO plants, how can it kill them for harvest?

  4. Saint Germain September 24, 2021 at 18:53 - Reply

    I attended a talk given by two whistle blower scientists from Health Canada in Vancouver, BC Canada. One shared how he was pressured by the Canadian Government to pass Monsanto’s RoundUp (Glyphosate) as safe before they had any appropriate data to do so. They were fired for holding up Prime Minister Harper’s agenda to support Monsanto at any cost; certainly without safety data. However, there was data. Those scientists discovered that Monsanto, to avoid legal liability, shared studies with the Canadian government then. As the two scientists described, Monstanto gave evidence showing liver damage after in a rat/mouse model. Canada’s legislation required three months of data so it was ignored. PM Harper’s regime is responsible for poisoning generations of Canadians. A true crime against humanity. Another cancer cause is radiation. The Canadian government including Health Canada supports covert and malicious attacks against humanity by slow poisonings. They rely on biased data to support commercial gain. It was made clear that a win for Monsanto by Canada’s adoption would have other countries saying Canada says it’s safe… Never trust Canada in anything they do. They have rejected my own poisoning based on the very symptoms found on the MSDS to continue to paint a rosy picture and exclude data showing harm to their endorsements. When government can never be wrong…the price is death to many. Democracy is the illusion. They who control the education win and practice areas win. I have a written reply from the now current premier of the Manitoba government, who responded as Minister of Health that he never gets involved in telling Health Care what to do. They write a blank cheque to health care with no oversight. So you must know they who write the medical education win as they do whatever they please which includes rejecting all data they want to. The same goes for PM Harper’s regime with the negative Monsanto RoundUp data supplied that gives clear warning glyphosate causes liver damage in just two months. Folks, it’s far worse than you think. The corruption is internal and hidden. How can it take a year and my poisoning is still not entered into Canada’s poisoning database. I receive puffery emails from government that tell me how good they are at the very job they’re supposed to be doing yet don’t. The irony is the oversight office for Health Canada (ombudsman like services for complaints) is run by it.

  5. Cliff October 3, 2021 at 05:38 - Reply

    It’s unfortunate that the regulatory agencies the FDA and the department of agriculture are controlled by former executives or attorneys for companies like Monsanto and Baeyer. So instead of eliminating glyphosate or around up they approve the product for an herbicide even though the research shows that it does produce cancer in laboratory rats. it is also true that Baeyer has been losing lawsuits against their company for not properly labeling RoundUp as a carcinogen. Many people have developed cancer because of the product.

Leave A Response