The EPA is Aggressively Approving Very Dangerous Pesticides

Posted on Jan 16 2020 - 9:37pm by Sustainable Pulse

As reported by U.S. Right to Know last May, court documents showed that a domestic policy advisor at the White House said, ‘We have Monsanto’s back on pesticides regulation.’

This article has been re-posted with permission from Organic Insider. If you would like to receive Organic Insider’s weekly email, you can subscribe HERE.

In a new and unsettling report from the Center for Biological Diversity, we now have confirmation that this promise is being kept.

The study, called Toxic Hangover: How the EPA Is Approving New Products With Dangerous Pesticides It Committed to Phasing Out, found that the EPA approved 1,190 pesticide products and denied only 71 in the 2017-2018 time period, giving it a 94% approval percentage.

And for the products that were denied, they were rejected largely because of procedural issues, such as minimum study or packaging requirements having not been met, rather than toxicity concerns.

The approved pesticide products include:

– 15 new products containing neurotoxic carbamates or organophosphates, including chlorpyrifos (Banned in Europe and a few U.S. states)

– 17 new products containing the endocrine disruptor atrazine (Banned in Europe)

– 6 new products containing paraquat, which is so lethal that one spoonful can kill a full-grown adult (Banned in 32 countries, including those in Europe)

– 4 new products containing the extremely dangerous airborne fumigants methyl bromide or chloropicrin (Slated for a global phase-out)

– 91 new restricted-use pesticides, which are so dangerous that they can only be applied by a professional

– 69 new products containing an ingredient the EPA recognizes as a “known” or “likely” carcinogen.

So, how is the EPA justifying all of these approvals?

By claiming that it is replacing and phasing out older, presumably more dangerous pesticide ingredients. However, the Center for Biological Diversity states that the agency has approved many more products with these older ingredients than products with the newer ingredients that were supposed to replace them.

“The EPA has been approving the worst of the worst, and the culture at the agency is very deferential to the pesticide industry. They don’t want to rock the boat,” said Nathan Donley, PhD, Senior Scientist and lead author of this report.

Even for consumers who eat 100% organic, they are not immune to the super-toxic pesticides being sprayed on non-organic food.

These chemicals contaminate our soil and water, sicken farmworkers, and can drift onto organic farms and make their way into the organic food supply. After all, there is a reason that USDA certified organic brands have been increasingly seeking out 3rd-party, glyphosate-free certifications, such as Glyphosate Residue Free.

Unfortunately, Congressional efforts to curb the EPA’s rampant approval of pesticides have made very little headway, which gives organic stakeholders just another reason to be concerned.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
(4 votes, average: 4.75 out of 5)
Loading...
About the Author
Sustainable Pulse

Sustainable Pulse is a global news outlet covering sustainable agriculture, GMOs and pesticides.

3 Comments so far. Feel free to join this conversation.

  1. PoisonControl January 18, 2020 at 04:53 - Reply

    I’m truly speechless. How could they? They are contributing to sickness and death.

  2. Scott January 23, 2020 at 20:22 - Reply

    “Congress effort to curb EPA”???? What congress?!?!? Not the UNITED STATES CONGRESS?!?! They are firmly innthe pocket of big ag…. BOTH “democrats” AND republicans. CONGRESS?!?! yeah…. right

  3. Jane Grey January 31, 2020 at 04:47 - Reply

    Unless we revert to regenerative farming worldwide and quickly we face all species extinction with the damage the use of toxic chemicals is doing to all life on earth .

    How can governments remain so ignorant ,and food producers so unethical , and downright greedy and untruthful so as to let this mass suffering due to sickness which we see in humans and eventual extinction occur?

    Jane Grey MD

Leave A Response