Has the US Biotech Industry Infiltrated the Russian Scientific Community?

Posted on Feb 17 2016 - 7:27am by Sustainable Pulse

Following the Russian State Duma’s approval of the first reading of a bill to ban the cultivation of genetically modified crops (GM crops) in 2015, there has been a push by pro-GMO forces to stop the ban. But who is supporting the pro-GMO forces in Russia?

The second reading of the bill to ban GM crops has now been tentatively scheduled for March 2016. Alexander Zhukov, the first vice-speaker of the Russian State Duma, announced on January 19.

On the same day as the tentative announcement was made for the second reading of the bill, TASS news agency published an article, which was picked up by many Russian news outlets,  titled “Russian scientists have refuted the findings of studies on the hazards of GMOs” about a scientific review by Russian and U.S. scientists from the Institute for Information Transmission Problems (IPPI RAS) and the University of Miami Miller in Critical reviews in biotechnology.

The review was published by Alexander Y. Panchin of IPPI RAS and Alexander Tuzhikov from University of Miami Miller and it was full of technical errors, poor scientific standards and biased data reporting, as can be seen in the response to the publication by a group of top scientists and other experts in Russia.

Alexander Y. Panchin’s close association with U.S. based scientists, as well as his immediate inaccurate attack on Prof. Gilles-Eric Seralini’s famous paper in 2012 on the toxicity of GM maize and Roundup, leaves many unanswered questions regarding his funding sources and also his relationship to the U.S. Biotech industry.

Panchin attacked Seralini on the basis of lack of statistical significance in the mortality rates and the number of tumors in rats, both of which arguments have been clearly dismissed here.

Panchin also launched a well-funded pro-GMO book and scientific regional tour in December 2015, alongside fellow pro-GMO supporters Dr. Mikhail Gelfand and scientific journalist Asya Kazantseva.

Maybe most worryingly of all is that following the push by these questionably funded pro-GMO supporters, on January 26 Russia’s President Vladimir Putin held a meeting with Dr. Vladimir Fortov, the head of the Russian Academy of Sciences, in which Fortov told Putin of the ‘benefits’ of GMOs.

According to Sustainable Pulse Director, Henry Rowlands; “There are likely to be two different pro-GMO forces at work in Russia. One is obviously U.S. biotech companies who have created good contacts in Russia over the past few years, despite the tensions between the two countries and the other is scientists who see the funding opportunities made available through biotechnology as too good to turn down.”

The Russian Government has stood strong in the face of increasing pressure from U.S. biotech companies and they are likely to continue doing so if they are fully aware of the Russian pro-GMO forces’ misleading claims and pseudoscience.

In December 2015, Russian President Vladimir Putin has told the Russian Parliament that Russia should become the world’s largest supplier of organic foods.

Also in 2015, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Arkady Dvorkovich stated that it is not necessary to use genetic modification to feed the world, at the 12th International ‘Science and Technology in Society (STS) forum’ in Kyoto, Japan.

This strength shown by the Russian government was also shown just last week when they dealt a huge blow to U.S. farmers, after banning all imports of U.S. soybeans and corn due to microbial and GMO contamination.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
(3 votes, average: 3.67 out of 5)
About the Author

Sustainable Pulse is a global news outlet covering sustainable agriculture, GMOs and pesticides.

7 Comments so far. Feel free to join this conversation.

  1. Irina February 17, 2016 at 19:22 - Reply

    Most active proGMO Russian scientists Alexandr Panchin and Mikhail Gelfand have mathematical education. They never tested influence of GMO on animals and know scientific literature on GMO problem very poorly. Perhaps the real goal of their activity is to get grants from Monsanto and other biotechnological companies..

    • Ron February 18, 2016 at 10:47 - Reply

      Irina, thanks for those thoughts and insights.

    • Vera February 21, 2016 at 23:41 - Reply

      Thank you for an accurate and truthful comment, Irina.

  2. 3xmommo February 18, 2016 at 18:56 - Reply

    I pretty much think that what Putin wants, Putin gets. And he does not like GMOs- for whatever reason. Maybe he is just smart.
    I would say that lots of scientists can and have been bought. We can be sure that the scientists who speak out AGAINST GMOs have not been paid anything by anyone- and that is for sure.

  3. Ron February 18, 2016 at 20:48 - Reply

    Deep down in their heart everyone wants natural, chemical-free, good quality food. However, some have justified and compromised their better judgement unable to see their folly as they buy into to the pro-GMO propaganda. Russia is beset with the same problem as we are in the United States. At least they are not being blind-sided as we were with genetic engineering’s early days of sneaking GMOs into our food system through government-influencing industrial farming and chemical corporations. Russia has the advantage of seeing in the U.S.how untrustworthy and manipulative those pushing GMOs can be.

    • Ron February 18, 2016 at 20:56 - Reply

      As to this comment. Just noticed someone here has the same name as me. Am unable to edit my comment. On future post I will change my name to MrNatural.

  4. Alan Grant February 20, 2016 at 04:36 - Reply

    Steven Druker should get his book Altered Genes, Twisted Truth translated into Russian!

Leave A Response